Talk:RAF Upottery
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Linkspam?
[edit]I am reverting edits by User:Chrisdunn112, which added links to a South West Airfields Heritage Trust website, because it seems to me that the linked page is of little value to this article. The additions are also suspicious in light of the fact that Chrisdunn112’s, other edits to articles added links to the same website in two other articles, creating the appearance of link spam. (I leave the other two articles for others to decide.) —teb728 t c 07:33, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Question by Chrisdunn112 (talk) 23:05, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
The fact that there is a refurbished Heritage Centre has relevance to RAF Upottery, surely? Why can you not leave a reference to that somehow? Also the South West Airfields Heritage Trust seeks to preserve the Heritage of the other Airfields that I have added links to. I am involved with another Airfield where Heritage links are normal, but apparently not for RAF Upottery. I do not see the problem. Chrisdunn112 (talk) 23:03, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- C-Class Devon articles
- Low-importance Devon articles
- WikiProject Devon articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- C-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- C-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles