Talk:Reasons to Believe

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Creationism

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Creationism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Creationism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CreationismWikipedia:WikiProject CreationismTemplate:WikiProject CreationismCreationism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Original research tag

This article seems to be entirely cited to the group itself or to its founder. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:14, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite research in progress

I am in the process of gathering research and materials for a full rewrite of theis article. I love input, criticism, and ideas. Help is also nice. Please share any of that with me.Rap Chart Mike (talk) 13:52, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Taking the rewrite live. Again, please offer further suggestions for improvement.Rap Chart Mike (talk) 19:45, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

Sometimes I wonder if it's possible for any Wikipedia article under the umbrella of Religion to be truly neutral. They all read as if they were written by skeptics with an axe to grind, and this article is no exception. Try RationalWiki if you just want to write about criticism but never counter-criticism or defense. Valjeanlafitte (talk) 10:47, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]