Talk:Red Inferno: 1945
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
PROD
[edit]this would make a valid redirect to the author, since the author wrote this title, therefore a good search term. 65.93.15.125 (talk) 05:31, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- it is very much doubtful the book's author wrote this article as it contains ludicrous wrong spelling of "it's" in place of "its" several times. WillNess (talk) 14:08, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- What has that got to do with anything? Most articles on Wikipedia are not written by the people the articles are about. 70.49.124.225 (talk) 10:44, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Implausibility of the plot
[edit]Stalin knew full well about the American atomic bomb project - several communists among its scientists (and not Rosenbergs) were regularly sending detaled reports to him, as was made public since the USSR's fall in 1991. There existed a special room in Kremlin full of smuggled documentation into which only Kurchatov himself had access, and was even prohibited to write anything down while in there, and had to memorize the stuff. Later on, returning to his HQ he would dispense "advice" to his scientists who were often dumbfounded by his prowess.
Knowing about the bomb, Stalin should've been an idiot to initiate a war against the US. WillNess (talk) 14:08, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Stalin knows about the bomb in the story also, thats why he tries to attack before it's finished. Read the story, then comment next time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.208.251.22 (talk) 11:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Wrong Syntax ?
[edit]Not that it is of any importance, but it seems to me that towards the end there is a slight mistake in syntax. One reads (since the Russians have more men to fight then they do with weapons to arm them). I propose a change to (since the Russians have more men than they have weapons to arm them with) or simply (since the Russians have more men than they have weapons). At least that's what I figure the author means... Alfadog777 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.70.5.146 (talk) 16:32, 15 December 2012 (UTC)