Talk:Remember December/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Oz talk 06:22, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Infobox
- Studio Wishbone
(Los Angeles, California) – It makes more sense if you set it out like that
- Lead
- "Remember December" is a song performed by American singer–songwriter Demi Lovato.It was written – add a space between "Lovato." and "It"
- It was released as the album's second and final single on November 17, 2009 via Hollywood Records. – Change "via" to "through"
- The single achieved minor – Change "The single" to "Remember December"
- Background
- "Remember December" was written by John Fields, Demi Lovato and Anne Preven, with production done by Fields – Change "done" to "handled"
- It was recorded by Fields at Studio Wishbone, Los Angeles, California – add "in" before "Wishbone" and "Los Angeles", and link "Los Angeles, California" as well
- Link guitars, synths, backing vocals, drums, and percussion
- Reception
- No issues
- Music video
- Did the video get any reviews? If so add some
- No it didn't. Pancake (talk) 13:50, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
- Track listings
- No issues
- Credits and personnel
- No issues
- Charts
- There needs to a space between this section and the References section
- References
- References 3, 7, 10 – Use "cite web" instead of "cite news"
- External links
- No issues
- OVERALL REVIEW
I have decided to put the article on hold because there are still some minor mistakes affecting the prose quality of the article. Also, the article needs a release history table. I will give you seven days to fix these mistakes. Oz talk 07:35, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
- All done! :) Pancake (talk) 13:50, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, one more thing, was the song released as a single in the US? If not, then it shouldn't be mentioned in the lead that it failed to chart in the US. Overall I am passing the article. Keep up the good work! Oz talk 13:56, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
- It was probably sent to Radio Disney or something, but I can't really prove it, so I will remove the sentence. Pancake (talk) 16:08, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, one more thing, was the song released as a single in the US? If not, then it shouldn't be mentioned in the lead that it failed to chart in the US. Overall I am passing the article. Keep up the good work! Oz talk 13:56, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
- All done! :) Pancake (talk) 13:50, 11 August 2011 (UTC)