Talk:RepRisk

Data products and services

This section repeats a lot that is elsewhere in the article. Does it need to be its own section? Pleasantville (talk) 19:53, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rejected by Articles for Creation

This article was rejected by Articles for Creation. The draft has been worked on and is less biased, it can be found here Draft:RepRisk, perhaps they could be merged. Jonpatterns (talk) 16:25, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've now merged in the draft.Jonpatterns (talk) 22:24, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Page improvements

Hello wiki editors. I spent a bunch of time researching this buisness as part of a larger project on sustainability. Some of the facts I pulled off the company website where I felt a citation was really needed but I could not find (at least not in US searches) other citations. But these are just a couple of places.

At a quick glance, the changes are:

adding some more current facts
adding citations
some formatting (bolding, italicisizing) and sentence structure improvements
adding wiki links
replacing some text that was paragraph form and putting it into numbered lists
replacing other text with bullet lists
adding columns or rows of data to tables as appropriate

There is one major section toward the end that displays a template indicating the section is lacking citations and I spent a good deal of time digging some up, but am not quite sure if there are now enough to justify removing the template, so I'm leaving the template in for now until I can determine that what's there now is sufficient.

I should have broken these up into several different "saves" or sessions to be able to more easily see what was changed but that occurred to me after-the-fact.

Any feedback please feel free to ping me @ Hero921 (talk) 21:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC) thanks!!![reply]