Talk:Riverside Park (Manhattan)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 08:00, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"Riverside Park has many..." needs a period.
- Done
I'm not familiar with "land condemnation", I Googled it and Eminent domain seemed like a reasonable link for it?
- Added
The area seems to be only mentioned once, unreferenced in the infobox (and to three d.p for acres, yet whole hectares...)
- Fixed And it was the wrong area to boot. epicgenius (talk) 21:20, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"191 acres (0.77 km2) " I would use hectares here instead of km2.
- Done
"By the 1850s, the city was" reiterate NYC.
- Done
"was slow to come" just slow, or slower?
- Fixed It was "slower" to come. epicgenius (talk) 21:20, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"the Hudson River.[4][5][6][8]" four cites really needed for this one claim?
- Condensed
"Circa 1890" not the greatest descriptive caption I've ever seen...
- Fixed
"in 1880[16][21] and instantly" awkward ref placement, and I imagine "quickly" is more accurate than "instantly".
- Moved
"starting with " redundant.
- Removed
"though the monuments did fit in with the park aesthetic" according to whom?
- Added
"Trains travel through..." needs a period.
- Done
"was $11 million" non-breaking space between 11 and million, and consider inflation.
- Done
"would disband in" just "disbanded in" would be fine.
- Done
"the park[104] and" awkward, move to end of sentence.
- Done
" a couple hundred " not encyclopedic in tone. Do you mean "approximately 200"?
- Done Added a more exact number. epicgenius (talk) 21:20, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"area co-ops " I assume you mean co-operatives?
- Done
"new Riverside Park South, s" why italics?
- Removed
" new bike path" cycle path.
- Actually, in the US they are generally called bike or bicycle paths. So I went with the latter. epicgenius (talk) 21:20, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"started in August 2016.[125] " still ongoing?
- Yes, the first phase opened in 2019. epicgenius (talk) 21:20, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"A bike bypass " cycle.
- See above.
"of the bike bypass " no need to repeat.
- Done
72nd and 125th Street are overlinked.
As is Riverbank State Park.
"The uppermost register, " no need to repeat register here.
Hudson River Park and Battery Park and Fort Washington Park are all overlinked.
- Removed all.
Is it "Fireman's Memorial" or Fireman's Memorial?
Check other monument names, for whether they should be in italics.
- Done Italicized appropriately, but most of these are not italicized, for some reason. epicgenius (talk) 21:20, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Age." [156] " remove space before ref.
- Done
Grant's Tomb, Ulysses S. Grant and National Park Service are overlinked.
"andmark[162] and a national" awkward.
- Moved
"Soldiers' and Sailors' Monument" and "NYC Parks" are overlinked.
NYC Parks is overlinked three further times before the end of the article.
- I hope I got all the overlinks. epicgenius (talk) 21:20, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
cafe or café?
- Cafe. epicgenius (talk) 21:20, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"110th-111th" etc, en-dashes.
- Done
Basketball, tennis and volleyball overlinked. Questionable if they need to be linked at all really.
Soccer is also overlinked.
- Removed both.
"dozens of fun events for all " not an advert.
- Removed
"Red-tailed hawk in Riverside Park" might be nice to mention this in the prose, and link the species.
- Done
NYC subway overlinked.
- Removed
"Giuliani, a wild turkey resident in the park" why is this see also and not mentioned in the article at all?
- Added to the article. epicgenius (talk) 21:20, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Spaced hyphens in the ref titles should be en-dashes.
- Done
A.L., E.P. - I think most recent advice is to space these A. L. and E. P.
- Expanded the author names. epicgenius (talk) 21:20, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's all I have here, on hold. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 07:57, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man, thanks for the review. I have addressed some of the preceding points and will shortly address the rest. epicgenius (talk) 19:46, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: I think I have tackled all of these now. epicgenius (talk) 21:20, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Marvellous, good work, promoting. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 10:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.