Jump to content

Talk:Robert Peverell Hichens/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Magic♪piano 14:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    Some images have confusing rights on their description page. If the images are out of copyright, remove the non-free image rationale.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:


Overall a nice read. You need to work on your grammar a bit -- I fixed a number of run-on sentences and other grammatical irregularities. I've noted above that a few of the images have descriptions saying they are PD, but also contain a non-free image rationale. This is something that ought to be fixed (also, you should probably use the {{Information}} template to capture the origin of the picture), but I don't think it's something to hold up passing the GA. Congratulations! Magic♪piano 15:49, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks changed the images to the inf template. --Jim Sweeney (talk) 13:33, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]