Talk:Roger Waters/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

First off, let me say that you've done good work here. This is an article that we can be proud of. However, from the talk page and ongoing significant edits the page is collecting, it is evident that there is still ongoing debate over the basic direction this article should take, how much weight it should give to what, and so on. As such, I am failing this page's GA nomination. A hold would not be appropriate, because unlike clear-cut technical issues (e.g. "replace reference X with a reliable one", "attribute images Y and Z") a discussion like this cannot be handled within a set timeframe. Once consensus on these matters are reached, please renominate the article, as it appears to be workable in all other respects. --erachima talk 04:57, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More specifically, the debate with respect to the weight the article should give Waters' Pink Floyd work vs. his solo career and how to handle the images need to be resolved and have had some time to demonstrate the stability of the solution before this page is ready for GA nomination. --erachima talk 05:05, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: erachima talk 04:57, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

erachima, thanks for your input, and per your concernes, I believe they have already been worked out. --GabeMc (talk) 00:47, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]