This page should not be speedily deleted because... multiple reliable independent sources have since picked up on the company. I think it meets SIGOV criteria now. 12345678 ... These are just a few I found from a quick google search.--TenToe (talk) 15:31, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The reason for the speedy deletion was that it was a non notable company. At that time that was the case. Since then, the company has expanded its operations. It now has headquaters in Asia and partners with major Asian music streaming companies. Since the beginning of 2023, Routenote has experienced a large growth in users, someting with many independent sources have also mentioned.
You are correct that when the article was first created, I don't believe it met notability guidelines. However now I believe - owing to the points I have outlined, aswell as it's significant coverage in secondary sources - it is notable enoigh to warrant an article. TenToe (talk) 18:57, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Pppery: All but two of the sources listed by TenToe are junk for establishing notability. Press releases, business listing profiles, blogs, the company's own website, etc. don't count. However, the cornwalllive and businesscornwall sources may squeak by the WP:CORP threshold, but should be reviewed by the community. Because the article content is substantially different with different sourcing from the deleted version, I have declined speedy deletion. This should be taken to AFD again. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:00, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
