Talk:Rudraveena (film)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 16:11, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

This is looking great! I'll get to this soon. JAGUAR  16:11, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

• "The events that led to the change in the elder Sastry's views form the remaining part of the story" - why elder?

• Removed.

• The lead summarises the article perfectly

• Thank you. :)

• Is Ramapuram a real place in the film? And if so, can it be linked in the plot section? I see that the dab page lists several villages

• I don't think so that it was a real place in the film. Having watched it, i can say for sure that it was sort of ambiguous when coming to its backdrop (district etc.).

• "Sastry is short tempered and discriminates against people based on their caste" - might be worth linking Caste system in India

• Done

• "Their pathetic situation leaves Suryam disturbed" - seems a tad informal here

• Not necessarily, but removed it as the readers can make up that the situation is really bad.

• "Initially successful, the plan backfires later" - this will sound better with an "although" at the beginning of the sentence: Although initially successful, the plan backfires later

• Done

• No dead links

• A special note of thanks to the archiving websites in this regard. :)

Outstanding work! I could only find a few minor issues in the lead and plot sections, but the rest of this article was flawless. It is well written, comprehensive, and well sourced. Even more impressive is that all of the references are archived, so a FAC might be a possibility in the future? Anyway, I'll leave this on hold until all of the above are clarified. JAGUAR  15:56, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

@Jaguar: FAC might not happen, but i am sure that this shall be one of my best works here for sure. I've addressed all the above listed concerns and am looking forward for further constructive comments if any. Regards, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:08, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for addressing them! I completely understand if you don't wan to go to FAC as it's usually a long and gruelling process. Even though I felt like this was a short review I'm happy that this meets the GA criteria so I'll pass it. It was a pleasure to review, as always. JAGUAR  15:51, 1 December 2016 (UTC)