Talk:Rugrats: Search for Reptar/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GRAPPLE X 15:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

I think I remember playing this when it came out, and I have a strange urge to try picking it up on the cheap now...

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   The prose style is fine, no problems that I saw.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   MOS compliance is grand.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

   Citations are handled appropriately, sources seem reliable, and nothing is left to original research.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Could do with a little more explanation in the "Gameplay and premise" section - fans of the show will know who Reptar is, but perhaps use the first mention outside of the lead to explain that he's a cartoon dinosaur. I'd also throw in a link to List of Rugrats episodes#ep29 when you mention "Chuckie's Glasses" (I assume that's the correct episode, I may be wrong).

   B. Focused:

   Article is focussed and stays on track perfectly.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Article is neutral and unbiased.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   Article seems stable, no edit warring or vandalism in its history.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Both rationales check out fine, though perhaps the screenshot's could be padded a little to resemble the cover art's rationale, though that's just me being fussy.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Images are used appropriately, and captioned well.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Nothing I've seen would prevent this article from being considered a Good Article. I've incorporated some changes based on what I've mentioned, though I've left the episode link out for now since I'm not sure myself if that's the one actually being referred to - I'll leave that for you to clarify. Otherwise, I'm passing this article. Well done!