Talk:Russian submarine K-114 Tula/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jivesh boodhun ( talk · contribs) 09:55, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

  • Note: Since most sources are in Russian, I am using Google translate for spotchecks. Please include the language parameter where needed. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 10:02, 1 January 2012 (UTC)


  • she carries - are submarines females? I thought we apply such subjects only in French language.
  • her during Tula's later operational life - Replace Tula's with her. The sentence is short and can be easily understood.
  • Done.  Done
  • She also equipped with - Something missing?
  • Done.  Done

>Really impressive though a short article. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 10:33, 1 January 2012 (UTC)


  • 4. Federation of American Scientists should not be in italics.
  • 7. Bellona Foundation should not be in italics.
  • 13. Add Digital Sky Technologies
  • 15. Barents Observer should not be in italics.
  • 18. Add Yulia Minder
Why can't they be in italics? They're the creators of the works, aren't they? As for Barents Observer, I believe it's a newspaper. And what's "Yulia Minder" and "Digital Sky Technologies"? --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 10:49, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Because Wikipedia does not italicize them. Normally, magazines and newspapers are in italics, not online publications. For instance, online magazines are not in italics. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 10:50, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Done with first and second. Barents Observer is a news source. What's "Yulia Minder" and "Digital Sky Technologies"? --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 10:53, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Okay. The two other are the actual publishers. Jivesh1205 (Talk)

Jivesh1205 (Talk) 10:43, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:

Jivesh1205 (Talk) 10:43, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Passing. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:19, 2 January 2012 (UTC)