Jump to content

Talk:Saegusa–Ito oxidation/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 21:24, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:25, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    The article is well enough written that I can follow it with my knowledge of Chemistry from an A-level over forty years ago.
    It follows the Chemistry project guidelines and Manual of Style.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    References appear to be RS and check out. I assume good faith for those which I cannot access. Citations follow Wikipedia:SCG
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    As far as I can determine, it is broad and focussed.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    I note that it is suggested on the file pages that .png images should be rendered as vector graphics, but that is not a GA requirement.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    I believe that this passes muster. I am happy to list it as a good article, congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 21:40, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]