Talk:Safety engineer

That's right, i can tell ... --Michaki 13:35, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What needs cleanup?

I just happened by this page. I see it is tagged as needing cleanup. Perhaps we can list here what cleanup we'd like to see. --Jdlh | Talk 20:57, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No context. The page just starts out saying what "safety engineers" need to be, with no introduction of what they are and in what context the concept exists. --Jdlh | Talk 20:57, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Who's linking to this article? Would be nice to look at "who links here" and see what those links want from this article. --Jdlh | Talk 20:57, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Only link is from Safety Engineering. --Jdlh | Talk 21:00, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm suspicious that this text is appropriated from somewhere else. Given how the text of Safety engineer has no context or introduction, I'm concerned that it might have been lifted from some other body of writing. That might be a copyright violation. --Jdlh | Talk 21:00, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- A brief google search doesn't turn up any hits on unusual words like "oddly enough" "paramount" "safety engineer" except in pages derived from Wikipedia. Much of the text for Safety engineer was added to Safety engineering on 2001-12-16 20:11:18 by anonymous editor 208.187.134.xxx. --Jdlh | Talk 21:14, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- That's one bad article, it looks like a commercial for safety engineers written by a self-satisfied safety engineer. I came here to learn about this role to know if I should apply to this sort of job. I only learned that these people are some sort of omniscient super-beings with holywood-movie fair-but-ruthless personalities. :-) Seriously, some clean up needed please!