Talk:Sant Bani School
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Regarding 158.65.161.112's edit summary
[edit]This: [1]. Please remember WP:CIVIL. And no one needs "permission" to create or contribute to any article on any subject on Wikpedia. Ripogenus77 22:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC).
Sciolists
[edit]Alumni familiar in detail with this school are more appropriate to determine accuracy of data than sciolists pretending knowledge and objectivity about all subjects in NH simply because they live here or have a government job. It's also a sad day when someone scoring a high SAT is considered "objectively" worthy of note and those who may be at any moment killed on the battlefield in defense of their country are simply too hyperbolic to be permitted a voice. Objectivity is not proven by similarity to emotional or intellectual pablum. Will henceforth refrain from using Wikipedia in my searches for information, and from viewing this page: this experience has been an object lesson in Wikipedia's manifest unsuitability as a reliable reference of any sort. Adherents of this Wikipedia standard would seem to put forth McDonald's reproducibility and homogeneity as evidence of superiority over the individuality, quirkiness and genius of a unique Michelin noted restaurant.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.69.129.11 (talk • contribs) 07:47, August 29, 2009
re: "Sciolists" comment
[edit]Please, remember that civility and a neutral point of view are two of the five pillars of Wikipedia, and the Sant Bani School wishes to maintain a page where these standards are followed. SBSalum92 (talk) 13:19, 4 September 2009 (UTC)