Jump to content

Talk:Savanna Samson/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I've read through the entire article and checked every source, and I honestly can't find any major problems. This is a well-written, well-sourced article.

A good article is:

  1. Well-written: Prose is good, MOS is good.
  2. Factually accurate and verifiable: Sources are good, no original research.
  3. Broad in its coverage: Covers main aspects, no unneeded detail.
  4. Neutral: Yes.
  5. Stable: Yes.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by images: Yes.

I've made a few minor CE tweaks and additions, but otherwise, that's an easy pass. — Hunter Kahn 04:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]