Talk:Scene Kid

Request[edit]

Actually, I don't want this deleted. I just want the double redirect updated and the article sent to 2000–2009 in fashion. Going with the theory that administrators watch over the Speedies, if one of you could fix this that would be fab. —tdltrombonator 21:32, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not cool. There are very simple proper channels for this request. I have, however, made the change this time. (Don't do it again!) - Dravecky (talk) 23:50, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heh. Sorry. I couldn't find any. (Believe me, I was looking!) —tdltrombonator 23:54, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs to be created[edit]

You guys gotta stop denying not only the existence of Scene, but the UBUITQUITY of it. seriously, look at all these sites, it's not some obscure neologism:

http://www.wikihow.com/Be-a-Scene-Kid

http://www.scenekidsearch.com/

google "scene kid" About 239,000 results (0.30 seconds)

http://www.scenehairtutorial.com/

http://scenegirls.org/

http://scenegirls.net/

http://sceneboys.net/

6,458 results for "scene kid" on Yahoo Answers

http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/scene-kids-are-like-so-not-wannabe-emos/2008/03/29/1206207488553.html

Lampsalot (talk) 17:00, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my response at Talk:Scene (fashion) or the message I left on your talk page. Also, you've now posted the same thread on 4 different talk pages. Please don't do this; it creates a completely disjointed conversation (as replies will be spread out across multiple talk pages). Please create only 1 discussion, in a centralized place (I suggest 2000–2009 in fashion, which is where these redirects all point to), then if necessary go to the other talk pages & leave only a brief note directing to that discussion. --IllaZilla (talk) 19:23, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 19 March 2013[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit fully-protected is being considered for merging. ›

This is a double redirect and should be directed to 2000–09 in fashion. - Camyoung54 talk 19:31, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Redrose64 (talk) 19:49, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 5 September 2014[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit fully-protected is being considered for merging. ›

There is a double redirect from here to 2000s in fashion I suggest redirecting Scene Kid to 2000s in fashion#Scene Kids MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:00, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Redrose64 (talk) 09:12, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]