Talk:Sexual Healing (South Park)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 17:26, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I am reviewing the article and so far I have only a few comments. It seems that a great deal of work went into this and it has paid off in a very well written article.

• "Particularly, Stone said he was simultaneously fascinated and disgusted by Woods's public apology, so the writers were sure to include it in the episode." - starting off with "particularly" seems odd.
  • Dropped that word. — Hunter Kahn 21:57, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
• The last section Dutch April Fools joke seems out of place. I don't see the relevance. Is it about this episode?
  • Yeah, someone else added that, and I agree it's not quite right for this article. I dropped it. — Hunter Kahn 21:57, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
• There is one dead link: http://www.southparkstudios.co.uk/guide/1401/
  • Dropped it. — Hunter Kahn 21:57, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Thats all for now! Xtzou (Talk) 17:26, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 21:57, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: Pass!

Congratulations! Very nice article. Xtzou (Talk) 22:02, 12 April 2010 (UTC)