Talk:Shiva Star

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

There's very little information here, it doesn't even say what Country it is talking about (though I assume it's the US). --Hibernian 23:41, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's also kinda paranoid. I'll flag it with something . . .

Marked for POV, Weasel Words and Cleanup

This article has been written by a user who is, frankly, a tinfoil hat. "Is or was..." and "But there is suspicion..." make this clear. It is salvageable, so I'm not putting it up for a VFD, and it's not that important an article - but it does still need a rewrite. Mysticaloctopus 21:06, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm deleting the weasel words and the unverified allegation that the project is being continued in secret. I won't have a problem if the user backs the statement up with a good, verifiable resource, but for now there is none so it should be removed. --Edwin Herdman 10:30, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update - I actually need some more time to get a handle on this. The Jane's article is the source for the so-called "weasel words;" they may still be weasel words but they weren't invented here - Jane's is at least reasonably well respected, after all! I'll look at conducting a rewrite soon. --Edwin Herdman 10:52, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]