Talk:Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I'm sorry, but this meets straight up quick-fail criteria.

• The tone is in-universe for several sections and comes across somewhat as original research.
• Prose in several sections is difficult to read.
• Gameplay may be grossly over-detailed.
• References are badly formatted, small amount of actual references for an article of this kind.
• No real development section, no reception section.

Overall...I'm sorry, but whoever rated this B did so incorrectly, and it's more accurately a Start-class article. That's not to say effort hasn't clearly been shown, because it's very visible. It just needs a major tune up before it can proceed to GA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kung Fu Man (talk • contribs) 04:25, July 2, 2009