Talk:Slit-scan photography

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Film (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.
 

Translation[edit]

(moved from Wikipedia:Translation into English)

  • Article: fr:Slit-scan
  • Corresponding English-language article: Slit-Scan photography
  • Worth doing because: French article is more extensive information worth incorporating into the English stub
  • Originally Requested by: Gobeirne 04:49, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Status: finished by Frenchgeek 21:17, Oct 16, 2004 (UTC)
  • Other notes:

Scope[edit]

I came here expecting an article on slit-scanning as traditionally used to produce stills (photo-finish pictures, panoramic images) as described here.

I can write a first stab at this, but should it all go in this article, or should there be a "slit scanning cinematography" article with the current article, "slit scanning photography" containing info about stills, and a disambiguation page? Ukslim 10:37, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Scope II[edit]

In the paragraph "Description" it is only described how to gain the Stargate-Effect, but Slit-scan is able to give a much wider variety of effects than mentioned. --84.185.23.3 (talk) 18:22, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Flatbed scanner[edit]

It's possible to create effects like this, with hand, face, or objects, on a flat-bed scanner. Scan your hand, and as the lit scanner-bar moves downward, move your hand occasionally. You get the same effect, explained by the scanner taking a series of 1-d slices of the picture at a time.

This is not in itself a useful technique, but I was reminded of this when I read the article. As an experiment for the reader to try, it might help get the point across.

92.40.254.224 (talk) 19:26, 16 December 2012 (UTC)