Talk:Sonic Forces/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 01:28, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- 'Hedgehog Engine' just redirects to 'Sonic Unleashed', which is linked in the same sentence in the lead
- Unlinked.
- 'spin and drop dashes' - can you briefly explain what this means to the reader? Perhaps mention what White Wisps are as well
- Explained everything.
- 'weapons known as Wispons,' - so just to clarify, Wispon is just the in-game term for 'weapon'?
- Pretty much.
- 'Doctor Eggman attacks a city' - does the city have a name?
- It has three names; I didn't want to chose just one. The levels are called "Ghost Town", "Sunset Heights", and "Park Avenue".
- 'Hedgehog Engine 2' just redirects to 'Sonic Unleashed' as well. At least link it to the development section at that article
- Changed target.
- 'featuring the "Sanic Hegehog" internet meme' - this needs explaining
- Explained.
- Wikilink Screen tearing
- Done.
- 'Hedgehog Engine' just redirects to 'Sonic Unleashed', which is linked in the same sentence in the lead
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- There's no point in listing the publisher and the work where both are exactly the same. I.e Techno Buffalo Techno Buffalo', 'VG247 VG247'
- Fixed.
- At least one of your references gives SiliconEra a capital E, the others do not
- I can't see any references that use Siliconera with a capital E. I gave the references a good look but can't see it.
- Dissident93 ended up fixing it shortly after I finished my review. :) Freikorp (talk) 21:14, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- I can't see any references that use Siliconera with a capital E. I gave the references a good look but can't see it.
- The 'August 31, 2017' twitter reference needs additional parameters
- Added some more parameters.
- I'd archive more of your sources before they inevitably start rotting, but that isn't a GA requirement
- I'll get to that soon.
- There's no point in listing the publisher and the work where both are exactly the same. I.e Techno Buffalo Techno Buffalo', 'VG247 VG247'
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Looks pretty good overall. Placing on hold until issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 01:54, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Freikorp: Think I've resolved everything. Responded above. JOEBRO64 12:39, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- I'm happy for this to pass now. Freikorp (talk) 21:14, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Freikorp: Think I've resolved everything. Responded above. JOEBRO64 12:39, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail: Looks pretty good overall. Placing on hold until issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 01:54, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
