Talk:Soprano trombone/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Marshelec (talk · contribs) 08:04, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
I plan to review this article over the next week. Marshelec (talk) 08:04, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Prose is of a high standard. No issues found with spelling or grammar. | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Follows manual of style guidance. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | References and bibliography listings are provided in suitable sections | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | There are comprehensive in-line citations throughout. Sources are good. A sample check of readily accessible sources was satisfactory. | |
2c. it contains no original research. | No evidence of original research | |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | The copyvio report returns nothing of concern | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Good coverage of the topic | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Stays on topic, and there is no excessive detail | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Content shows fair representation without bias | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Edit history shows the article is stable and free from edit wars etc | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | All images are tagged with appropriate copyright licenses | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Images are interesting, relevant, and with good captions | |
7. Overall assessment. |
Review comments
|
---|
Review comments[edit]The lead[edit]
History[edit]
Construction[edit]
Sopranino and piccolo trombones[edit]
|
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.