Talk:Soviet destroyer Serdity (1940)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 01:33, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Looking at this one. —Ed!(talk) 01:33, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written:
- Pass A few quibbles:
- "after receiving a message that a German convoy had been spotted." -- Any idea of where that convoy was or how far away?
- Pass A few quibbles:
- Sadly no.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:10, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- "Postwar, the wreck was raised in pieces and towed to Tallinn for scrapping between 1949 and 1952.[6]" -- does this mean it was towed from 1949 to 1952 or scrapped from 1949 to 1952, or both?
- Both, I think.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:10, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Dab links and external links show no problem. Fixed one dup link and no others are problems. Copyvio tool shows green.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable:
- Pass Offline sources accepted in good faith. A cursory check of the source material on Google in English sources backs up material cites in the article.
- It is broad in its coverage:
- Pass Appropriate context included from ship class article; additional detail really only has a place there for consistency.
- Would prefer to have a unit cost, but records on this subject aren't common in the source material as I understand it.
- Pass Appropriate context included from ship class article; additional detail really only has a place there for consistency.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy:
- Pass Healthy mix of book sources, in both Russian language and English text. No over-reliance on any one historian or source material.
- It is stable:
- Pass No problems there.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
- Pass One image included under public domain tag where appropriate.
- Other:
Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:10, 13 January 2019 (UTC)