Talk:SpongeBob SquarePants (character)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Maybe it should be said what creatures Squidward and Patrick are in the "Appearance and characteristics". In the "Appearance and characteristics" section, I also think the word "talented" should be removed, per MOS:OPED. The controversy about Spongebob was in 2005, still the section is written as it appeares now. Also, the part about the promotional video's premise should be described earlier in the section.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   does ref 2 serve as a source for the sentence "He is sometimes shown to have hair." ? Otherwise, links look fine, checked them out with the link checker tool.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Please solve the above issues.--Music26/11 17:52, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. I've made some changes based on your comments. The sentence about hair was (un)sourced to the show itself, but I've decided to completely remove it as it is a minor aspect. Bill ^{(talk|contribs)} 20:53, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

I made some minor edits myself too, it looks good enough for GA now.--Music26/11 20:39, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Excellent, thanks. Bill ^{(talk|contribs)} 20:49, 13 November 2008 (UTC)