Talk:Squat Milada/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Mujinga (talk · contribs) 18:24, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: BigChrisKenney (talk · contribs) 05:09, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Mujinga: I will be reviewing this article as part of the January backlog elimination drive.

Initial Assesment

Intro

Good!

History

I would like to see this section 'beefed up' a little more. I would suggest adding a date or year when it was built and the owner or company that built it. Also, add the year that it was removed from the cadastre.

The sources don't supply those details, sadly Mujinga (talk) 17:54, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Social centre

Good!

Post-eviction

Is there any more new information on the house?

I've added a bit more but there isn't much extra to be said, it's still derelict as far as i know (and i found a source to get that "as of" up to 2023) Mujinga (talk) 17:55, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Both are in the public domain or creative commons. Would be nice to see a modern picture.

agreed but can't find more recent pix Mujinga (talk) 17:55, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

All seem to be good and in order.

A good, short article. More details need to be added before I would pass the article. You may find more details on the corresponding wikipedia artle here: https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vila_Milada.

Hope the comments help! BigChrisKenney (talk) 05:09, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @BigChrisKenney thanks for taking this on - I've made some replies. I took another look at the CZ article which isn't in the best of shape but i did find a few more czech news stories so it was def worth doing. I'll expect you'll want to do some spothecks? Best wishes for 2025! Mujinga (talk) 17:59, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Final Assessment

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):

b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (references):

b (citations to reliable sources):

c (OR):

d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):

b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):

b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall: Pass/Fail:

Thank you, Mujinga, for reviewing so quickly. I've looked at the article again and due to the length of the article and the lack of more detailed information as I mentioned before, I am going to ask for a second opinion before passing.

Note to 2nd opinion reviewer: There are three things that give me pause before passing the article.

The overall length of the article. (I know that shorter articles have been promoted to GA)
The lack of more detailed information about the dates of construction and removal from the cadastre.
The lack of information as to what happened after the university purchased the property.

I may be a bit off about it, but I'd rather be safe than sorry as I am still a relatively new reviewer. Thank you! BigChrisKenney (talk) 06:00, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BigChrisKenney, sure that makes sense. It's good to get advice when needed on wikipedia and hopefully someone will pop up. Once you've done more reviews and know more reviewers you can also ask people informally, I'd be fine with you asking me (obviously not in this case since I'm the nominator). To reply to your points, I think the length is ok since all relevant details are included and if the sources aren't specific about dates, then the article can't be either. The lack of recent info is frustrating, but the future of the site is undecided and until that point, there isn't much more to be said - I have looked for more news in EN and CZ, but nothing turned up. Speak to you again when this moves forwards! Mujinga (talk) 13:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]