Talk:Standard operating procedure

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Talk:Standing operating procedure)
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Military history (Rated Start-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality assessment scale.
WikiProject Business (Rated Stub-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Suggested improvements to this Article[edit]

This article does not consider differing roles that SOPs can (should) play in various industry sectors. Also, this article contains information about military and business use of SOPs which seem contradictory at times. Suggest moving the military component of SOPs (irrelevant to business) out of this article to a perhaps more appropriately named 'Standing Operating Procedures' which may, perhaps, be for routine tasks but in a less predictable environment.

Reference 1 (https://rdl.train.army.mil/soldierPortal/atia/adlsc/view/public/11444-1/FM/1-02/chap1.htm) does not contain a definition for improvement. Should reference 1 be removed?Skierbrian (talk) 14:06, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

The paragraph headed Military use contains poorly constructed sentences and needs to be rewritten. Rossmcm (talk) 03:04, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

clinical sop's[edit]

The general use section focus' completely on SOP's in clinics and says practically nothing about general use of SOP's in industry. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.194.178.251 (talk) 13:57, 2 March 2007 (UTC).

General use: Standard operating procedures, as the term is used in the world of 'Quality Assurance' (visit www.iso.org to view International Standards for Quality Management Systems - ISO 9001:2000 and 15,000 other International Standards)refers to a document that describes how a process is carried out. It may be called 'the way to do something' and should show (in a header or some kind of title block) its name, who wrote it, who authorized it, when it was put into circulation and have some kind of revision control so the user can tell if he or she is looking at the most current version.

It also helps to have the 'scope' of the SOP defined so that the user knows whether the document applies to the activity they are doing. If there are forms that need to be filled out or records filled in, they should be referenced in the 'method' section of the SOP. In an electronic environment, the SOP could have a hyperlink to the form or database to take the user to the place where they need to enter information.

As a process improves, obviously, the SOP needs to be updated to reflect the most current way of doing things.

A 'checklist' can also act as a type of SOP since the checklist tells the user what they have to do as they go down the steps and check off their activities. A checklist would not be called an SOP by 'purists' because it likely wouldn't contain enough information.

A great tool to include with an SOP or use as an SOP is a flowchart or workflow diagram. Once you use the 'cross-functional' flow chart (see Microsoft Visio software) you now have the steps described in order showing who does the step. It has it all. You can include a title block on a flowchart, too, that includes all the things that your 'Document and Record Control' SOP require. So that means you can create an SOP to show you how to write an SOP!

A typical SOP could include this information in the title block or somewhere visible: Author, approval, date approved, date put into use (could be the same date and your Documentation SOP would explain that), page number and total number of pages.

SOP Template headings could include: 1.0 Scope 2.0 References (documents that were used as reference material to create this SOP) 3.0 Definitions and/or acronyms 4.0 Method (This can include a flowchart and a grid or table describing the process steps. You can also hyperlink the boxes of your flowchart to 'sub-processes' that show more detail) 5.0 Related documentation (forms, checklists, databases, other related SOPs, equipment manuals, software manuals, related websites, intranets, internal storage systems, or anything the user could benefit from while they're following the SOP) 6.0 Contact information if it was not included in the title block

The beauty of SOPs is that it gives an organization a place to start from. Continual Improvement is important for survival, and SOPs give you a platform to do improvements from. "If you're not getting better, it's going to feel like you're getting worse", especially to employees using these SOPs. That's why they (the employees) are the best people to write them. And make your SOPs easy to update so people will keep the documentation current for new hires - SOPs make it quicker for new people to become productive. SOPs are also handy for actitivities that your organization doesn't do too often and people need a refresher for.

SOPs are also a great training tool. When standard operating procedures accurately describe the way to undertake a task and that task involves an element of OHS safety, the SOP can be used a training tool to ensure compliance with workplace safety. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.101.146.86 (talk) 03:41, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Set up the 'flow' using the 'Process Approach'. Inputs - Process - Outputs. And remember to put some resources into the picture (Human, infrastructure and work environment) and finally, controls (SOPs, checklist, laws, regulations, Policies, Acts, etc.) that make the process run smoothly.

Retrieved from "http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Talk:SOP"

Humor[edit]

Well before the European series of programmes for homologation, the phrase was often heard with reference not only to tedious bureacracy and wastefulness but also to the illegal, immoral, or dangerous -- but nonetheless prevalent -- activities that get performed by the functionaries of massive organizations, starting with the military and continuing to all bureaucracies and also some idiosyncrasies of private firms (not corporations, which are themselves bureaucratic, but partnerships or family firms). 4.154.252.131 (talk) 00:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Standing Operating Procedure NOT Standard OP[edit]

Even a cursory investigation would show that SOP actually stands for Standing Operating Procedure, it apparently has been bastardized over the years into Standard OP.192.91.147.34 (talk) 21:52, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Standard operating procedure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:31, 14 January 2016 (UTC)