Talk:Stardust (Willie Nelson album)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 11:12, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Looks nice :)! I remember it stubby, but now... another great article

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• ISBN/ISSN check: The short footnote's 13 and the book reference's date are different
• Dabsolver check: fixed two dabs
• Checklinks check: ok
• Reflinks check: ok
• Fixed dashes
• Do you agree with this edit? I think it was reasonable; if you agree with me, then their rating and refs should be removed.

• On hold I give you time to fix these issues.
• Pass I changed the date for the Draper Robert short footnotes (1991->1986 as the reference below suggest October 11 1986 as date). Also as a test I found the October 11 Billboard magazine, and looking at the front cover, I think it was the correct magazine and my edit accurate.