Talk:Sticky note
 | This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • Post-it note Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Post-it note |
The Post-it brand is no longer the only legitimate brand of sticky notes in the global market. The Stick'n brand from Taiwan is another. The producer of the latter also has proper legal rights to produce and sell them. The formulae of the glues are different, too.110.174.132.162 (talk) 14:27, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- The post-it note article is not strictly about the 3M brand, it's about the general concept. Regardless, it's still a duplicate of the existing article, if you're trying to create an article that's specifically about this Stick'n brand, then you'll have to establish that this brand is notable first and you should probably create that at Stick'n or a title like that. Dylsss (talk) 14:42, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- You look like a loyal adherent of 3M. First of all, you should realize that Stick'n is a significant brand(https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/post-it-sticky-notes-market-2020-top-countries-data-market-size-with-global-demand-analysis-and-business-opportunities-outlook-2024-2020-08-11) according to consumers, not according to how much it is mentioned on Wikipedia. By the second standard just mentioned, I see no chance of making the right academic information stay. If I created a page about Stick'n, someone may simply delete it and say that it is not already notable on Wikipedia. By this logic, the existence of an article for Stick'n can simply be banned by people who have the most time to spend. I am not hired by HOPAX or anybody, so I know that I am definitely wasting time... I shall give up on this unacademic edit war.110.174.132.162 (talk) 15:04, 11 October 2020 (UTC)