Talk:Stockwell Day/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
What?
'The Liberals' attacks on Day ending up decimated the NDP and Progressive Conservatives.' I don't even know what this is trying to say, whoever wrote it should write it over. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.98.199.152 (talk) 02:46, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
The second paragraph is obviously a totally irrelevant and probably untrue attempt to insert political rhetoric into an otherwise informative article: "Canada is quietly pursuing legislation that would allow the police to demand personal information from telecommunication companies without a warrant. I believe this is an important issue and I believe that the government should hear from all interested stakeholders, not a hand-picked, secret group! This new consultation... for Canada, will conclude on September 25th Person in Charge: Stockwell Day , P.C., M.P." Maybe this is a valid point, maybe not, but why is it part of the article on Stockwell Day? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.32.153.190 (talk) 03:50, 25 February 2010 (UTC)