Jump to content

Talk:Student government political party

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More examples

[edit]

Some other universities that seem to have these parties. I'm not saying the sources below are all reliable - some may be, some definitely aren't - just that they're clues as to where else this happens, which might help someone find better ones and put something in the article:

  • Columbia University - [1]
  • University of Memphis - [2]
  • Florida Gulf Coast University - [3]
  • University of Michigan-Dearborn - [4]
  • Brooklyn University - Bush, Melanie E. L. (16 January 2011). Everyday Forms of Whiteness: Understanding Race in a 'Post-Racial' World. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 71–78. ISBN 978-0-7425-9997-0.
(that section of the book refers repeatedly to "Working Together Always" and "The Liberal Party" at Brooklyn)
  • Lawrence Technological College - [5]
  • UCSB - [6]

Of course, what would be really valuable isn't examples but sources discussing the idea of these parties in general, talking about their nature, origins etc. I haven't found that yet. Mortee (talk) 17:43, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A couple more, anyway -

One general one:

  • Walker, Kenneth N.; Weinberg, Ian (27 January 2017). "A Typology of Student Politics and Political Systems". In Feldman, Kenneth A. (ed.). College and Student: Selected Readings in the Social Psychology of Higher Education. Elsevier Science. pp. 427–433. ISBN 978-1-4831-8691-7.
    • But this is talking more about wider political parties having branches on campus, rather than campus political parties per se. If you do use it, there'll be a better way to cite it, since the paper was published in a longer form in the American Journal of Sociology in 1969.

Mortee (talk) 19:23, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is at least least one article online discussing the idea of these parties in general, it is about whether USC should have them like UCLA does.--I'm on day 4 (talk) 23:57, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

More secondary sources

[edit]

More secondary sources would be greatly appreciated, thank you!--I'm on day 4 (talk) 08:40, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]