Talk:Subject (documents)

Cribbed

Most of this is directly copied from Hjørland, Birger. (2016). Subject (of Documents). http://www.isko.org/cyclo/subject

EarthSprite^∞ 17:09, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

it seems like that author first wrote this wikipedia article, then turned it into the essay linked above (note that the isko page states "This is a major revision of an article formerly published by the present author on Wikipedia" at the bottom); the wikipedia article was started by the same author in october 2011 (several years prior to the original publication date on the isko article) and virtually all edits made through the end of that year are also by hjørland (who was indefinitely blocked in 2020 for copyright violations). so idk what the licensing rules are in this case. regardless, most of his material still stands in the article, and it serves to argue for or against the validity of different viewpoints on the concept of a subject, calling one "wise", another "unacceptable", a third "convincing". i've tagged it with the "essay" template; is there a more appropriate tag to give it? -170.213.22.187 (talk) 18:35, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not encyclopedically written

Much of this is written as arguments evaluating the various merits of the given systems rather than a neutral description of what it's talking about — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.213.22.187 (talk) 20:41, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]