Talk:Sublingua/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 21:23, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- I'll review this! MathewTownsend (talk) 21:23, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- review
- I've reviewed this article and made a few minor copy edits which you are free to change.[1]
- The changes look excellent. Thanks for the ce and typo fixes. – VisionHolder « talk » 00:06, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
- I have just one question. Why under "Literature cited" do some of the citations have an "edit" link to edit the citation? (I've never seen this before.)
- Those citations use the templates {{cite doi}} or {{cite pmid}}. The templates are useful for standardizing and simplifying references between articles, and since I may be using these same sources for articles like Toothcomb or an upcoming article like Anatomy of lemurs. – VisionHolder « talk » 00:06, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
- Otherwise, it is a great, informative little article - just right! MathewTownsend (talk) 22:46, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks! I still hope to provide better illustrations soon. But I figured this was good enough for GA. – VisionHolder « talk » 00:06, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:
- B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Provides references to all sources:
- B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Provides references to all sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Main aspects are addressed:
- B. Remains focused:
- A. Main aspects are addressed:
- Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Congratuations! Very nice! MathewTownsend (talk) 00:10, 21 February 2012 (UTC)