Talk:Summerwild Productions
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Summerwild "know" for producing[edit]
Edited section that states "Summerwild is know for producing" since that is strictly a POV. For example, I have never heard of them, though of course some may have, so it's difficult to measure that they are "known" for something. As well "know" should have been "known."
Deepcloud (talk) 20:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
@Deepcloud
What you say makes some sense, but I don't know if it is an issue that Wikipedia generally views as providing a point of view. If so, then the following articles (and hundreds more) should be changed: Harbour Publishing, Portland, Oregon, Kentucky, Minnesota, Arizona, California, Wisconsin, Maine. All contain things that they are "known for" that I didn't actually know. Is there perhaps a better edit, like "best know by those who..." or something else?
Noroadhome (talk) 09:45, 10 Feb 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.5.141.30 (talk)
I think the neutrality issue could be solved by ridding the article of any bold or capitalized characters that may draw attention to certain aspects of the article. Also, the headings could be merged/changed to simply read "publications", rather than highlight particular publication. I will try those changes.
Noroadhome (talk) 11:16, 10 Feb 2010 (UTC)