Talk:Survivor Series (1992)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I am reviewing your article for GA and will be adding comments below. I am reading through the article and have copy edited a few things in order for it to make more sense to me. Hope you don't mind. If so, let me know. —Mattisse (Talk) 22:55, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- Comments
- "According to WWF storylines, Samoans have thick skulls" - what does Samoans mean in this context?
- I am struggling with all the names and plots but I guess there is no way to make that easier for the reader!
—Mattisse (Talk) 22:55, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- "Samoans" just refers to people from Samoa. However, I can see that, since I didn't clarify that The Headshrinkers are from Samoa (and since their manager used to be part of a tag team names The Samoans), it wouldn't make a lot of sense without clarification. Does it work now? GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:30, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- Is there a simple explanation for what "tag in" means?
- Also, in the beginning of the article, you regularly say "the Bossman", but I notice as you get into describing the matches you call him "Bossman".
- Is there a definition of "buyrate"?
—Mattisse (Talk) 23:37, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
The few issues I raise above, I know you will take care of appropriately and they don not prevent this article from passing as a GA. —Mattisse (Talk) 00:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): Very well written
b (MoS): Follows MoS
- a (prose): Very well written
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): Necessary statements are referenced
b (citations to reliable sources): The references are to reliable sources.
c (OR): There is no OR
- a (references): Necessary statements are referenced
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): Sets the context
b (focused): Remains focused on article subject
- a (major aspects): Sets the context
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias: NPOV
- Fair representation without bias: NPOV
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Congradulations! Another GA for you!