Talk:Swiftsure-class submarine

Military history: Maritime / Technology / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Replacement Discrepancy

The introduction states that the class is being replaced by the Astute-class submarines, however the Class overview says 'Succeeded by: Trafalgar class'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xigan (talk • contribs) 08:28, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

not at all, the astutes are replaceing the swiftsure and trafalgar Aunva6 (talk) 04:14, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is a lack of respect , knowing that the Falklands / Malvinas islands mentioned in Article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiftsure-class_submarine , are considered disputed by the UN, not allow to put Falklands / Malvinas in that artuclo as well as the article is not neutral because it mentions that Argentina invaded the islands , where a country can not invade its territory As a result of his attitude to arbitrarily remove my corrections , I'll take an attitude befitting a dictator and above all things, a coward who hides behind a nickname — Preceding unsigned comment added by Remsvangsten (talk • contribs) 22:28, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Construction programme - (a) Hull builder

Editor either misattributed, or fabricated. Citation 8 as VSEL is utter bollocks.

VSEL were not the shipbuilder. VSEL did not exist until 1986.

Vickers Limited Shipbuilding Group were the constuctors of ALL S-class boats.

Article locked

WTF is this article locked ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.105.108 (talk) 14:03, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was locked because of persistent vandalism such as this.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:37, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]