Talk:Symphony No. 1 (Shostakovich)

	Classical music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
	This article is supported by Compositions task force.

Soviet Union Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Isn't it in major?

Isn't it in major? Looked like it when I played it.... (Hapless Hero 19:07, 8 May 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Not officially, but I think the difference is theoretical rather than real. Henry ^Flower 19:44, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lively and witty

I'd say the "lively and witty" description applies only to the first two movements- about halfway through it becomes quite serious and tragic at times.--Saxophobia 13:28, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wagner quotations

Is there any more specific information available regarding the Wagner quotations in the 3rd and 4th movement (which motive from "Siegfried", which other motive) ?Masetto (talk) 11:47, 15 November 2008 (UTC) Does anyone know the answer?Babyboomer1206 (talk) 16:17, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Should Mahler be mentioned?

Should Mahler be mentioned in the influences section? It seems to contradict what the composer's page says: "1927 also marked the beginning of the composer's relationship with Ivan Sollertinsky, who remained his closest friend until the latter's death in 1944. Sollertinsky introduced Shostakovich to the music of Gustav Mahler, which had a strong influence on his music from the Fourth Symphony onwards." It seems that he hadn't heard Mahler's music until that point, but I might be wrong. Xenofan 29A (talk) 21:16, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting consensus to move section 'Notable Recordings' to new page Symphony No. 1 (Shostakovich) discography

First of all, calling all the recordings listed here notable would probably be inappropriate and using Recommend Recordings would be too POV [as pointed out by Wspencer11 on Talk:Symphony_No._4_(Shostakovich)]. I, therefore, suggest that we move the section to a separate page entitled Symphony No. 1 (Shostakovich) discography. Requesting consensus. Centaur81 (talk) 09:05, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

oppose - the article is not too large. --A1 (talk) 19:49, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Why not just rename the section here "Discography", and thus avoid the problem of POV involved in calling any recording "notable" or "recommended" as much as possible? Mahlerlover1 (talk | contributions) 23:08, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose ~ same as per Talk:Symphony No. 2 (Shostakovich). OK for starting a new article, but do not move that section. (please see: Talk:Symphony_No._2_(Shostakovich)#Requesting_consensus_to_move_.27Notable_Recordings.27_to_new_section) –pjoef (talk • contribs) 13:35, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Teacher helped with the orchestration

I recall reading that there was speculation at the time that Shostakovich's orchestration teacher helped with the orchestration. Can anybody confirm that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.69.250.59 (talk) 05:44, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]