Talk:TNA Unbreakable/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: ChrisGualtieri (talk · contribs) 16:36, 4 January 2014 (UTC) I'll take this one. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:36, 4 January 2014 (UTC) Good Article Checklist
- Well-written -the prose is clear and concise, respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
- Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; and it contains no original research.
- Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
- Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each.
- Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
- Illustrated, if possible, by images: images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
Good Article review progress box
|
- Disambig links:OK
- Reference check: OK
Comments: This article needs to be copyeditted for prose and better separate fact from fiction. The problematic section is the Aftermath section.
- "Daniels suffered an injury in the storyline due to the attack, sidelining him until December 11 at TNA's Turning Point PPV event. At that event, Daniels saved Styles from an assault by Joe following Joe's victory over Styles to win the TNA X Division Championship.[26] " - Is fine.
- "Raven did not receive a rematch for the title, instead Jarrett was scheduled to defend the championship against a returning Kevin Nash at Bound for Glory. Nash could not attend the event due to a medical emergency, with TNA holding a Ten-Man Gauntlet match to find his replacement at the show. Rhino ended up winning the match, thus taking Nash's place in the main event.[35] " - Assuming this is a real medical issue?
- "TNA management were very upset with Sean Waltman after he failed to appear to participate in the Four Way Elimination Tag Team match.[21] This was due to him being one-half of the winners of the Chris Candido Memorial Tag Team Tournament.[39] Waltman was in Orlando and dressed to compete, but did not arrive at the arena in time to participate in the match.[21][40] He was not used again by TNA until January 15, 2006 when he appeared at their Final Resolution PPV event.[27]" - This was copy pasted from another article or vice versa. Prose issues here. And explanation and is this real or scripted?
- "Caldwell called this an "awesome spot!" in his review of the show. " Interrupts the prose.
When I originally reviewed this, it looked like it had more issues than it really did, but I think just some quick editing and clarifying the details will make it passable. Placing on hold for fixes. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 14:24, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- I've fixed all that you have listed above. Other than that I'm unsure of what problems there are. I've written so many of these they tend to just take on the same format and this is usually as clear as it gets regarding the fiction/realism aspect.--WillC 19:29, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- I understand. I don't want to impose any over-the-top criteria, but I just like coming at the topic from the perspective of the uninformed reader. I'll take a check through tomorrow and likely pass it, I just need to unwind and view it again with fresh eyes. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:49, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- I see where you are coming from. I try to write the articles to best suit WP:JARGON, WP:IN-U, and WP:FICTION the best that I can. I take the uninformed person into account and try to make it as commonsense or straightforward as possible while still keeping a level of credibility.--WillC 06:02, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Understandable, and I do appreciate the effort taken to do that. We have far too few articles that are of this caliber on the project. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:05, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks and take your time. I'm in no rush. I got other things going on anyway.--WillC 23:15, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Understandable, and I do appreciate the effort taken to do that. We have far too few articles that are of this caliber on the project. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:05, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- I see where you are coming from. I try to write the articles to best suit WP:JARGON, WP:IN-U, and WP:FICTION the best that I can. I take the uninformed person into account and try to make it as commonsense or straightforward as possible while still keeping a level of credibility.--WillC 06:02, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- I understand. I don't want to impose any over-the-top criteria, but I just like coming at the topic from the perspective of the uninformed reader. I'll take a check through tomorrow and likely pass it, I just need to unwind and view it again with fresh eyes. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:49, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Passed. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:03, 11 January 2014 (UTC)