Talk:Tapion

Tapion's Sword

Sasuke-kun, that wasn't Tapion in the video. I don't know who it was, but it definitly wasn't Tapion. In that scene, Tapion and Minosha are ontop of buildings with the orcana's. And Tapion has red hair. KojiDude (talk) 22:53, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I wasn't looking carefully. --Sasuke-kun27 00:33, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No reason to apologize. Your intentions were good. =) KojiDude (talk) 02:13, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

No need to keep the article. It's just a plot summary of a character that's not notable beyond one movie. Agree or disagree? Nemu 20:27, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He's plenty notable. He has alot of information, and is an upcoming character in Tenkaichi 2.--Koji Dude ^{(Contributions)} 21:08, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, this "info" is a bloated summary that would be reduced to two paragraphs at most. It just needs his orgin, small description of the role in the movie, and what happens to him, not every single detail in the movie. Just because he's in a video game doesn't make him have any info. Should Cell Jr.'s and Saibamen get articles also? Nemu 21:17, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So I supose we should just redirect the Goku article too? After all, it's mostly just a plot summary, correct? And like you said just now, video games or merchandise don't matter.--Koji Dude ^{(Contributions)} 21:34, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, the Goku article has a bloated plot summary, he also has other notable information. He also has the function of being the main character of a large franchise, being used outside Dragon Ball, and having much more possible information. Game mentions are fine, but it's not something to decide a page's importance off of. Nemu 21:42, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]