Talk:Taylor series/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tarret ^talk 16:16, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Seems to clearly conform to WP:MSM, and has a style that is consistent with similar articles that are GA-class

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Key areas such as the "History section" have citations. In the long-term the paragraph starting "Uses of the Taylor series..." under the section Analytic function and the section called Taylor series as definitions may eventually require a citation as although this may be common knowledge to a person studying the topic, the common person may still benefit from being able to verify these claims should this article eventually be submitted for a WP:FA. (See WP:SCG)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   I will assume that the Mathematics Wikiproject (or an Mathematics expert) can confirm that this article has all the major aspects.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Keep up the good work on this article.