Talk:Technical support scam/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 23:05, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I will review this article due to the ongoing GAN backlog. I will start the review tomorrow. Cheers, --Vacant0 (talk) 23:05, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vacant0, could I confirm if you are still reviewing this? Pahunkat (talk) 10:25, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I will start the review in a couple of minutes. Vacant0 (talk) 11:26, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Comments[edit]

General[edit]

51k bytes–the lede should get expanded, if possible.
Vacant0, is that enough or should I expand it further? Pahunkat (talk) 15:11, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Rest of the article is good and well-written, I haven't noticed any errors while reading.
Copyvio unlikely, 8.3%–passes.
It is neutral, and there haven't been any disputes lately.

Photos[edit]

File:Tech Support Scammer Fake BSOD Virus Popup.png should be removed, no source was provided.

Done Pahunkat (talk) 15:11, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

All are alright, YT video can stay.

On hold. --Vacant0 (talk) 13:45, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting. Vacant0 (talk) 15:55, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! Pahunkat (talk) 16:00, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Vacant0 (talk) 16:00, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]