Talk:Terropterus/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 19:12, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

  • "more sparse " – consider rewording as some people prefer "sparser".
changed "arranged in a more sparse manner" to "arranged more sparsely". Ichthyovenator (talk) 00:32, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the lead, it states that the species is the only mixopterid known from Gondwana while the body states that it is "the first known mixopterid from the southern continent of Gondwana". Please clarify.
It basically means the same thing - it's the first one to be discovered from Gondwana, so is also the only one known so far. I've changed things around so that it now just goes with "only one known" in both places. Ichthyovenator (talk) 00:32, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Ichthyovenator (talk) 00:32, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ichthyovenator: Thank you for making these amendments. The article is now ready to review. simongraham (talk) 13:15, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment[edit]

  1. Comprehension: The comprehension is good.
  2. Neutral Undetermined
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (prose) The prose is generally clear, concise and understandable. Pass Pass
    (b) (MoS) The article is compliant with the manual of style. Pass Pass
  3. Verifiability: The article is verifiable.
  4. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (references) The article has a list of references and in-line citations for its contents in the body. Pass Pass
    (b) (citations to reliable sources) Sources used are reliable. Pass Pass
    (c) (original research) No original research found. Pass Pass
    (d) (copyvio and plagiarism) No flagrant copyright issues found with Earwig's Copyvio Detector. Pass Pass
  5. Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive.
  6. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (major aspects) The article broadly covers all major aspects. Pass Pass
    (b) (focused) The article is focused without unnecessary deviations. Pass Pass
  7. Neutrality: The article is neutral.
  8. Pass Pass
    Notes Result
    The article is compliant with the policy on neutral point of view. Pass Pass
  9. Stability: The article is stable.
  10. Pass Pass
    Notes Result
    No ongoing content disputes or edit wars present. Pass Pass
  11. Illustration: The article is well illustrated.
  12. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) No copyright issues found, images are appropriately tagged. Pass Pass
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) Use and captions are good. Pass Pass
  13. Overall: Pass/fail.
  14. Pass Pass
    Notes Result
    Congratulations, Ichthyovenator. The article meets the criteria to be a Good Article. Pass Pass
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.