Talk:Thangals

India: Kerala Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

i could read a sub topic as 'Controversy' in the contents of this page.The Editor/person who marked it as 'controversy' is requested to show if there is any special reason for this argument. Haseebsaqaf (talk) 12:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shihabthangal

This family is one of the famous family —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.229.235.38 (talk) 06:36, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BUKHARI THANGALs family

they contribute to number of great ulamas in India. Not always political, but were Sufi sients. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.14.129.181 (talk) 00:29, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mixup

There seems to be a mix up in the article between two entirely different word usages.

One is തങ്ങൾ. This word is connected to a particular section of people of the Malabari Mappilla society. Traditionally there are certain restrictions placed upon on other Mappilla people from using such usages as Nee നീ, Inhi ഇഞ്ഞി, Avan അവൻ, Oanഓൻ, Aval അവള്, Oal ഓള് etc. upon them.

The other meaning of this word is something like their in Malayalam (തങ്ങളുടെ). This usage has no connection with Mappillas.

The mix up in the article is with regard to the higher form of You in the local feudal language Malayalam. That word is താങ്കൾ and not തങ്ങൾ. However, both words are spelt the same in English transliteration, usually, i.e. Thangal. But the താങ്കൾ word can be written as Thaangal.

Source: The above information are picked up from this book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.222.164.202 (talk) 03:22, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the contentious texts which precipitated this mix up and has given additional references. --jojo@nthony (talk) 14:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]