Talk:The Cock/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about The Cock. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Expanding article
These articles can be used to expand the article re: the local resistance the bar faced when it moved most recently. Morgan695 (talk) 19:42, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- https://bedfordandbowery.com/2015/08/the-cock-is-moving-into-lits-old-space-will-prevail-against-naysayers/
- https://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20150818/east-village/community-board-blocks-cock-from-moving-into-former-lit-lounge-space/
- Thank you! I will go through them shortly. Armadillopteryxtalk 21:55, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Done, and thank you also for digging out sourcing for the owner's name! Armadillopteryxtalk 00:12, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Lead citations
@Morgan695: Just curious, why did you remove the citations in the lead when MOS:CITELEAD says, The presence of citations in the introduction is neither required in every article nor prohibited in any article
? I prefer to put the citations in the lead, and it's perfectly within policy. Armadillopteryxtalk 01:37, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- I find it's WP:OVERKILL to cite the lead, but don't feel strongly enough about it to edit war over it. Morgan695 (talk) 04:15, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Just wanted to understand. Armadillopteryxtalk 04:41, 26 May 2020 (UTC)