Talk:The Eyes of the Overworld

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Novels / Fantasy (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Fantasy task force.


The spoiler section is accusatory toward Cugel's behaviour and is hardly written with a neutral point-of-view. We're dealing with a fictional character in a work of fiction here, not some guy on trial for being amoral or whatever and the tone of this article needs to reflect that. Peter1968 13:59, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Whenever I turn someone on to this book, the first reaction I get is that Cugel behaves appallingly (or if by a woman, that Cugel behaves appallingly to women). I don't see how that can be softened in any accurate review. The concept of an anti-hero is a familiar one in literature and need not be explained anew on every occurrence. What makes Cugel remarkable is that he manages to remain an anti-hero without tipping over into pure villain, despite many truly atrocious failings of character. TheNameWithNoMan (talk) 12:04, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Revised article[edit]

I've tried to offer more of a summary and to soften the critique of Cugel a bit. He *is* a terrible person, in real-life terms, but obviously Vance manages to win us over to him anyway. --Andersonblog 23:03, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Alternative title[edit]

The Eyes of the Overworld is also known as Cugel the Clever. Thus I believe the later should redirect to this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 22:10, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Addition of ISBN from Wikidata[edit]

Please note that this article's infobox is retrieving an ISBN from Wikidata currently. This is the result of a change made to {{Infobox book}} as a result of this RfC. It would be appreciated if an editor took some time to review this ISBN to ensure it is appropriate for the infobox. If it is not, you could consider either correcting the ISBN on Wikidata (preferred) or introducing a blank ISBN parameter in the infobox to block the retrieval from Wikidata. If you do review the ISBN, please respond here so other editors don't duplicate your work. This is an automated message to address concerns that this change did not show up on watchlists. ~ RobTalk 01:22, 15 May 2016 (UTC)