Talk:The Holocaust in Bohemia and Moravia/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 19:32, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:32, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sturmvogel 66 do you know when you might be able to start the review? Thanks in advance, (t · c) buidhe 04:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Images properly licensed
Between 1917 and 1920, anti-Jewish rioting occurred and many Jews experienced antisemitism in their daily life.[11][12][13] Antisemitism in the Czech lands was lower than elsewhere in Central and Eastern Europe Don't use antisemitism in such close conjunction. I'd suggest rewording the second sentence or merging the two together.
an end to racial persecution as a reason for seeking asylum I'd suggest adding "valid" before "reason"
The arrival of German-speaking Jewish refugees contributed to a rise in antisemitism in the rump Czechoslovak state.[24][33] The rise in antisemitism was tied up with a changing definition of nationality and citizenship which became ethnically exclusive. Another proximity alert for antisemitism
Tell the reader that Der Stürmer was the Nazi Party newspaper
As a result, for the non-Jewish population of Prague deportation of Jews from Holešovice became a regular event, awkward
Several Holocaust perpetrators and collaborators were tried before People's Courts and executed, as part of a purge of collaborators that was one of the strictest in Europe.[200][201] People who denounced Jews or helped to purge them from associations were punished harshly, unlike Aryanizers. This seems disconnected to the rest of the paragraph
Link Sinti
I suggest that you merge all of the subsections in your Sources together. Otherwise readers will have to scan all three to find the full citation when only the author is given.
Your book chapters need the editor(s) added
An excellent read, just needs a few tweaks--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:51, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks so much for the review! I have done most of this, except:
  1. The bit on Holocaust trials, which is kept with related material dealing with seeking justice for the Holocaust
  - 1. I agree that it should remain in the section, but it's a pretty serious stretch to go from accounts of difficulties in regaining citizenship and property to prosecutions of collaborators and perpetrators. Break it out into a separate paragraph or fold it into the first paragraph. If available some numbers of trials would be useful for comparative purposes.
  1. I prefer to have separate sections for different types of sources
  - Fair enough, but I think that it makes things harder for the reader.
  1. All the books are uniquely identified by titles and isbn, I don't think that including the editors is helpful. Some of my FAs have passed this way, so I think it is an acceptable citation style. (t · c) buidhe 03:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - That's not how I was trained, but I can see your point.

Only one issue remaining.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:52, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I have moved the info on criminal trials as suggested. (t · c) buidhe 03:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]