Talk:The Legend of Korra season 2
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 July 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Legend of Korra organization RfC
[edit]I've set up a request for comment (RfC) on the talk page of the article about the series about how to organize the topic into subarticles. If you are interested, I'd appreciate it if you would add your opinion in that RfC. Sandstein 06:59, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Info for episodes that haven't come out yet
[edit]If the episode hasn't aired yet why is there information in their summary sections? Until they come out I'm blanking the summaries for episodes 11-14, they're all speculation. Mrmoustache14 (talk) 02:24, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
One source: Reception
[edit]The "reception" section relies almost exclusively on the opinions of IGN's Max Nicholson, especially in the third paragraph. More diverse views should be incorporated--maybe even some criticisms? I can't be the only person on the internet who thought there were some issues... 64.58.7.42 (talk) 16:53, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:The Legend of Korra (Book 1) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 16:00, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
More Balanced Criticism
[edit]The criticism section is almost universally positive biased, when nearly all the references contain negative criticisms as well. In addition, plenty of non-positive reviews exist. It's a disservice to only mention/reference the positive aspects of a season. It would be nice to have a more balanced and well-rounded criticism section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.99.65.50 (talk) 19:28, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- Can you provide examples of critical opinions from reliable sources that you think should be mentioned? Sandstein 19:53, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Ongoing Vandalism
[edit]There's someone dedicated to vandalizing this article, making up new characters and inserting them into episode descriptions and changing things around. Is there any way to easily block and undo this? MythicFox (talk) 09:54, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- Can you provide diffs? Sandstein 15:07, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- Actually, it looks like someone seems to have gotten to it. But to see how extensive it was, check the comparison for the two most recent versions in the history. MythicFox (talk) 17:31, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- A certain degree of vandalism is routine and to be expected, and is often quickly addressed. In frequent cases (several times per day), it can be reported to WP:AIV. Admins will then address it. Sandstein 20:03, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- Actually, it looks like someone seems to have gotten to it. But to see how extensive it was, check the comparison for the two most recent versions in the history. MythicFox (talk) 17:31, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- List-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- List-Class Episode coverage articles
- Low-importance Episode coverage articles
- Episode coverage task force articles
- List-Class Nickelodeon articles
- Mid-importance Nickelodeon articles
- Nickelodeon task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- List-Class Animation articles
- Low-importance Animation articles
- List-Class Animation articles of Low-importance
- List-Class American animation articles
- Low-importance American animation articles
- American animation work group articles
- List-Class Animated television articles
- Low-importance Animated television articles
- Animated television work group articles
- WikiProject Animation articles