Talk:The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
As part of the Wikiproject Good Articles' Sweeps, I am checking that this GA still meets current criteria. Comments:

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

The problem with this article was that the images are not in compliance with WP:NFCC. I've stripped two images out of the article and downsized the resolution of the remaining two, but those ones still need expanded fair use rationales to be in full compliance. I'm passing as all the other aspects are fine, but I would hope the images are taken care of. --Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^(talk) 20:47, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

• Both images seem to be fine in fair use rationale with sufficient explanations, and there was no reason to remove the other two either as the article was still within the acceptable range of fair use images. The article should be a FA, not being re-reviewed for GA. TJ Spyke 20:51, 15 June 2009 (UTC)