Talk:The MacKintosh Man

Correct title: MacKintosh

This page with the capitalized "K" is the original and correct spelled screen title of the movie: MacKintosh not Mackintosh. Compare IMDb, too. Thus this page has to be deleted to move the wrong spelled movie page. VINCENZO1492 07:28, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What is going here? First revert by an IP because "IMDb is not a reliable source" - ignoring that I named the movie itself a the primary source. Please be so kind and read before reveert.

Second revert by declining the speedy delition - reason: Speedy deletion declined. Mackintosh is a genericized trademark. Prima facie, it would appear that the title "The MacKintosh Man" is not the correct article title. What has the wrong spelled movie title from 1973 in common with a genericzed raincoat trademark? Prima facie, it would appear that someone who is doing statements & decisions as an admin does not understand (or is not interested in) whats going on about this movie title and should not do decisions or statements in this case any more. I am really sorry, but the statement given is simply useless and it is just wasting time in supporting WP with proper and correct contents. P.S. Watch the original movie and make your statements and decisions afterwards. VINCENZO1492 10:36, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ATTENTION! Admin rights abuse! Admin Shirt58 is controversial about my opinion in the matters of title spelling The Mackintosh Man or The MacKintosh Man. He uses his admin rights to decline speedy deletion of The MacKintosh Man-redirect, uses most strangest justifications for his declines - some of them have nothing to do with the movie or the contents of the movie article(s) (e.g. raincoat trademarks). Thus he is part of the controversy, but he is not going into discussion but is still using his admin rights to make edits and thus taking decisions in this matter. If he is part of a controversy with another user he has not the right to use his admin rights to overrule another user. Especially after he is not taking part in the content's discussion. This disqualifies himself for the use of his admin rights and also as an admin he has not the right to reign over other users but he is behaving like this to make his edits the ones that are used for the article(s). This is an abuse of his admin rights. VINCENZO1492 04:52, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Personal attack removed) with best regards from VINCENZO1492 10:42, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]