This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Why are these links re-directing here? Each college, at least the two undergraduate ones, deserves their own articles. They are not the same school, nor are they so closely affiliated as to be combined on Wikipedia. Can someone explain the rationale before I attempt to change anything? Genuinely curious here. Beginning01:00, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
According to the Sage website, the three schools are chartered as a single institution, so I think that's why they're combined here. If the current article was separated into three schools, you'd end up with three one-line stubs, so expanding the current article is probably a bigger priority. --Piels22:28, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
It would be no different than Barnard having its own article even though it's part of Columbia, or the regional campuses of the University of California system having their own articles. An RSC degree is from RSC, not "The Sage Colleges." I've been to Russell Sage and the Sage College of Albany is never even mentioned there. I think I could fairly easily expand an RSC article into something with meat, but I suppose I'll lose that battle. Thanks for commenting. Beginning03:00, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
I agree that there should be separate articles. There is enough information and the colleges are distinct enough that they should exist. It's not as if they were two campuses of the same college. This article as it exists now is definitely not giving the information that it should, and if the different articles need to be stubs for now, so be it. I'm going to go ahead and edit this page with the idea that there will be seperate articles. Cpastern02:59, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
